(PC) Sosa v. CSATF Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20231:19-cv-01333California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE LUIS SOSA, No. 1:19-cv-1333 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. DOES 1-3 AS DEFENDANTS R. HULSE, et al., (Docs. 82 & 94) Defendants. 16 Jorge Luis Sosa is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants Hulse and Does 1-3 subjected him to excessive force and sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment and that they retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment. (Doc. 20.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff “failed to provide the Court and the Marshal with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons and complaint on Does 1-3 within the time period prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).” (Doc. 94 at 3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Doe Defendants be dismissed from the action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.