(PC) Sosa v. CSATF Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE LUIS SOSA, No. 1:19-cv-1333 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
v. DOES 1-3 AS DEFENDANTS R. HULSE, et al., (Docs. 82 & 94) Defendants. 16 Jorge Luis Sosa is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants Hulse and Does 1-3 subjected him to excessive force and sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment and that they retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment. (Doc. 20.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff “failed to provide the Court and the Marshal with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons and complaint on Does 1-3 within the time period prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).” (Doc. 94 at 3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Doe Defendants be dismissed from the action…