(PC) Ramos v. California Dept of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20232:22-cv-00004California306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE RAMOS, No. 2:22-cv-00004 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPT OF

CORRECTIONS,

15 Defendants.

17 By order filed September 16, 2022, the court found plaintiff’s complaint did not state a 18 claim and granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. On November 2, 2022, the 19 court granted plaintiff an additional 90 days in which to file an amended complaint. That time 20 has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 23 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 24 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 25 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.