Trujillo

Trujillo v. Gogna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20231:22-cv-00707California493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:22-cv-0707 JLT SAB Plaintiff, ORDER THE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

PAUL GOGNA dba PRINCE FOOD & GAS, et al. (Docs. 13, 15, 16) 15 Defendants.

17 Jose Trujillo asserts Paul Gogna dba Prince Food & Gas; Huda-Cal. Properties, LLC; and Akbar Ali Huda are liable for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and denial of full and equal access to public facilities under California law. (See generally Doc. 1.) Plaintiff seeks default judgment against each of the defendants. (Docs. 13, 15.) On March 1, 2023, the magistrate judge found “service was properly effected on Defendants Akbar Huda and Huda-Cal, but service is not adequate as to Defendant Gogna.” (Doc. 16 at 13; see also id. at 7-13.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the motion be denied as to Gogna. (Id.) In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.