Trujillo
Trujillo v. Gogna
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:22-cv-0707 JLT SAB Plaintiff, ORDER THE FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING
v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
PAUL GOGNA dba PRINCE FOOD & GAS, et al. (Docs. 13, 15, 16) 15 Defendants.
17 Jose Trujillo asserts Paul Gogna dba Prince Food & Gas; Huda-Cal. Properties, LLC; and Akbar Ali Huda are liable for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and denial of full and equal access to public facilities under California law. (See generally Doc. 1.) Plaintiff seeks default judgment against each of the defendants. (Docs. 13, 15.) On March 1, 2023, the magistrate judge found “service was properly effected on Defendants Akbar Huda and Huda-Cal, but service is not adequate as to Defendant Gogna.” (Doc. 16 at 13; see also id. at 7-13.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the motion be denied as to Gogna. (Id.) In…