(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, No. 2:22-cv-01954 TLN CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has paid the filing fee. On March 15, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (ECF No. 13.) On March 20, 2023, plaintiff filed a response, highlighting the difficulties faced by pro se plaintiffs and asserting in conclusory terms that defendant JP Morgan Chase violated her constitutional rights. (ECF No. 16.) While the court is sympathetic to the challenges faced by pro se plaintiffs, the fact remains that plaintiff has filed several frivolous lawsuits against JP Morgan Chase, as set forth in the Order to Show Cause. Moreover, nothing in plaintiff’s response nor in the First Amended Complaint suggests that plaintiff can state a…