CDCR

(PC) Rojas v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20232:22-cv-01547California2,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-cv-01547 DAD DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTION AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro so, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants infringed on a patent held by plaintiff. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Also before the court is defendant Asutra’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 9.) For the reasons stated below, it will be recommended that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without leave to amend as duplicative. Plaintiff motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot and defendant Asutra’s motion to dismiss will be denied with prejudice as premature. //// //// SCREENING I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.