(PC)Elliott

(PC)Elliott v. Ehlers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20232:22-cv-01040California286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-cv-1040 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS R. EHLERS, et al., Defendants. 16 On November 21, 2022, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On January 25, 2023, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file a second amended complaint. On February 23, 2023, the order was re-served on plaintiff at his new address of record. Thirty days from that date have expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.