Cox
(PC) Bailey v. Cox
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
° UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
v. RESPONSIVE PLEADING 11 T. COX, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 15 action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 16 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On March 23, 2023, Defendants, by way of special appearance, filed a request to extend 18 the time to file a responsive pleading to allow the United States to arrange for representation and 19 the filing of a response. Good cause having been presented, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are 21 granted sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order to file a response to the operative 22 complaint. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. F- 2 ee 95 Dated: _ March 27, 2023