Marcy
Marcy v. J.R. Simplot Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIELLE MARCY, an individual, on No. 2:22-cv-00523-TLN-CKD behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
ORDER Plaintiff, 13 v. J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants.
19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Danielle Marcy’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to 20 Remand. (ECF No. 19.) Defendant J.R. Simplot Company (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. 21 (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 23.) Also before the Court is Defendant’s 22 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Notice of Removal. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff filed an 23 opposition. (ECF No. 33.) Defendant filed reply. (ECF No. 36.) For the reasons set forth 24 below, the Court DENIES both motions. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant employed Plaintiff as a non-exempt hourly employee with the State of California. (ECF No. 19 at 9.) On February 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed this putative class action in San Joaquin County Superior…