(PS) Ringgold v. Burgett Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RINGGOLD, No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER BURGETT, INC., doing business as (ECF Nos. 37, 38) PIANODISC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Edward Ringgold proceeds pro se with claims against his former employer, Burgett, Inc., doing business as Pianodisc. (ECF No. 19, Operative First Amended Complaint.)1 Plaintiff has filed a motion styled as a motion to “reject/strike” defendant’s answer, or, in the alternative, requesting the court to order that the owners of Burgett, Inc., sign declarations under penalty of perjury as to the answer. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff has also filed a copy of a correspondence from plaintiff to defendant’s counsel. (ECF No. 38.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the court takes the motion to strike under submission on the record and briefs on file. The hearing set for April 5, 2023 is vacated. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motion to strike and disregards the…