Hill

(PC) Perry v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20232:21-cv-01719California421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THOMAS EDWARD PERRY, No. 2:21-cv-01719 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated October 5, 2021, the court found plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 4.) The court dismissed the complaint and granted plaintiff thirty-days leave to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis was also simultaneously denied and plaintiff was ordered to submit a new affidavit in support of his request or pay the filing fee for this action. (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, submitted a new in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.