Perez
Hormel Foods Corporation Hourly Employees' Pension Plan v. Perez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION Case No. 1:22-cv-00879-JLT-EPG
HOURLY EMPLOYEES’ PENSION
PLAN, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER SETTING DEADLINE RE:
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
v.
MARIE E. PEREZ, (ECF Nos. 11, 12) Defendant.
15 16 17 Plaintiffs filed this action on July 15, 2022, seeking to recover funds allegedly paid in err 18 to Defendant. (ECF No. 1). Defendant appeared pro se at a telephonic status conference but has failed to timely respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 8). While Plaintiffs state that the parties tried to settle the matter, Defendant has purportedly failed to respond to Plaintiffs’ attempts to execute a final settlement agreement. (ECF No. 11). Accordingly, Plaintiffs have sought and obtained a clerk’s entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). (ECF Nos. 11, 12). Given the Clerk’s entry of default, the Court will set a deadline for Plaintiffs to move for default judgment under Rule 55(b)(2).1 Additionally, the Court advises Plaintiffs of the…