Watts

(PC) Bradford v. Watts

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20232:21-cv-01846California971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRAFORD, No. 2:21-CV-1846-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS V. WATTS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1. As required under the Prison Litigation Record Act, the Court issued an order addressing the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint. See ECF No. 16. In that order, the Court summarized Plaintiff’s allegations as follows:

Plaintiff names the following as defendants: (1) V. Watts, prisoner incarcerated at California Health Care Facility (CHCF) acute pip- A2A cell-Room 137, post office box 213040, Stockton, California 95213; (2) Delgato, correctional officer at CHCF; (3) Donahue, mailroom supervisor at CHCF in Stockton; (4) Gomez, correctional officer in acute pip program A2A at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.