Honea

(PC) Mitchum v. Honea

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20232:22-cv-02313California598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ERNEST MITCHUM, JR., No. 2:22-cv-2313 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND KORY HONEA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMEDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a Butte County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se with civil action. On March 6, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court gave plaintiff two options: (1) proceed on a claim arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against defendant Butte County based upon plaintiff’s allegations that he suffered injuries as a result of a lack of handrails near toilets and showers; or (2) seek leave to file an amended complaint in an attempt to cure deficiencies in the original complaint concerning other claims and defendants. Plaintiff has indicated he wishes to proceed on the claim described above. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Service is appropriate for defendant Butte…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.