Ramirez

Ramirez v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20232:21-cv-01017California598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDIA RAMIREZ, et al., No. 2:21-cv-01017-MCE-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CORNERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 6, 2023, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order granting two Motions to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiffs LaJuan Dennis (“Dennis”) and Claudia Ramirez (“Ramirez”), respectively. See ECF No. 45. The Memorandum and Order stated, in part, the following: Not later than thirty (30) days from the date this Memorandum and Order is electronically filed, Dennis and Ramirez shall each notify the Court whether they intend to proceed with this case and if so, whether they have been able to obtain new counsel or whether they intend to proceed pro se. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action as to Dennis and/or Ramirez only. Id. at 8. On February 7, 2023, the Memorandum and Order was served by mail to both Dennis and Ramirez. See ECF Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.