Compher

(UD)(PS) Quizon v. Compher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20232:23-cv-00571California887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROLAND QUIZON, et al., No. 2:23-cv-00571-DAD-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE

TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

KRISTINA COMPHER, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT

Defendant. (Doc. No. 2)

17 This is an unlawful detainer action brought under California state law by plaintiffs Roland Quizon, Ryan Nakamoto, Charles H. Ventura, and Richard C. Ventura against defendant Kristina Compher. On March 27, 2023, defendant, proceeding pro se, removed this case to this federal court from the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1.) According to defendant, removal is proper because this action purportedly arises under federal law. (Id. at 2.) Also on March 27, 2023, defendant filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2.) A district court has “a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.