(PC)Vasko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN MICHAEL VASKO, No. 2:21-cv-02347 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

AMADOR COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendant violated his rights through entrapment, cruel and 19 unusual punishment, prejudice, and violation of the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 1 at 3.) 20 Before the court is plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and plaintiff’s 21 complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). 22 For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that this action be 23 dismissed with prejudice. The court will order plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 24 denied as moot. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity…