Vance

Vance v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20232:22-cv-00044California4,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARI VANCE, on behalf of herself No. 2:22-cv-00044-MCE-KJN and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 Through this class action, Plaintiff Shari Vance (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, seeks relief from Defendant Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (“Defendant”) arising from the labeling and sale of Zicam Pre-Cold Products. See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 20 (“FAC”). Plaintiff’s FAC lists the following causes of action: (1) breach of express warranty; (2) breach of implied warranty of merchantability; (3) breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose; (4) violation of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq. (“CLRA”); (5) violation of California’s False Advertising Law, California Business and Professions Code §§ 17500 et seq. (“FAL”); (6) violation of the “unlawful prong” of California’s Unfair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.