Perez

(PC) Gilbert v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20232:22-cv-02160California4,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES TRAYZON GILBERT, No. 2:22-cv-2160 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he was falsely found guilty of a rules violation in retaliation for exercising his first amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 3.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.