Schell

(PS) Hopping v. Schell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20232:21-cv-01623California1,713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHANIE HOPPING, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01623-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS AND DENYING THEIR MOTION

FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

LORIN EDWARD SCHELL, et al., ECF Nos. 2 & 11 Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

LACK OF JURISDICTION

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 19 This case was opened when plaintiffs Stephanie Hopping and Diana Hopping filed a document styled as a notice of removal, asking the court to issue an order transferring to this district a state probate case that was adjudicated in 2016. ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs have not properly removed a state action to this court, and I therefore construe their notice as a complaint. So 24 1 I take judicial notice of the state court docket in In re: Estate of Monteserrat Schell, No. 25 2014-0000489…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.