(PC) Leonard v. CSP Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20232:22-cv-01231California2,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON THOR LEONARD, No. 2:22-cv-01231 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious risk to plaintiff’s health safety, in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons stated below, the complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) However, it appears from plaintiff’s updated address that plaintiff is no longer incarcerated. As such, plaintiff must submit a new request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.