Frazier

facts are in dispute, without providing any contradicting evidence or evidence that could 25 demonstrate a dispute of fact. (See ECF No. 28-1.) As discussed in more detail below, the Court finds Defendant’s arguments disputing these facts largely unpersuasive.

Defendant notes this fact is disputed based on inadmissible hearsay and lack of foundation grounds, however, appears to concede this fact in their opposition. (Compare ECF No. 28-1 at 5 “Plaintiff’s alleged facts are based on inadmissible hearsay statements” with ECF No. 28 at 5 (ECF No. 28-1 at 12). Since her departure from Ulta, Plaintiff continues to suffer from paranoia and anxiety, and whenever she goes to Vallejo or Fairfield, she gets anxiety. (ECF No. 28-1 at 12.) B. Disputed Facts The instant case turns almost exclusively on facts related to the following: interactions between Plaintiff and Ms. Beck; comments, and actions by Ms. Beck; as well as comments, acts, and inactions by Ulta management related to Plaintiff’s dealings with Ms. Beck during Plaintiff’s employment. Defendant asserts all such interactions, comments, actions, and inactions by Ms. 9 …