Provins

Prehired, LLC v. Provins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20232:22-cv-00384California7,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PREHIRED, LLC, No. 2:22-cv-00384-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S

MATTHEW PROVINS, COMPLAINT Defendant. (Doc. No. 28) 16 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute. (Doc. No. 28.) The pending motion was taken under submission by the previously assigned district judge on May 25, 2022. (Doc. No. 51.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendant’s motion to strike the complaint. BACKGROUND In its complaint, plaintiff alleges as follows. Plaintiff Prehired, LLC (“Prehired”) is a company that trains and mentors its clients, including defendant Matthew Provins, regarding “skills and techniques that are required or helpful in order for them to seek and obtain employment in the software sales industry.” (Doc. No. 1 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.