(PC) Hebebrand v. San Joaquin County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20232:22-cv-00730California394 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY HEBEBRAND, No. 2:22-cv-00730 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 23, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1 ////

26 1 The court’s November 23, 2022 order was returned as undeliverable to plaintiff. Under Local Rule 183(b), plaintiff is required to update the court when his address changes. If mail is returned as undeliverable to plaintiff, he has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.