Tappan

(PC) Jaramillo v. Tappan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20232:22-cv-00075California2,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE ANTHONY JARAMILLO, No. 2:22-cv-00075-WBS-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. TAPPAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are plaintiff’s requests to propound additional interrogatories on defendant (ECF No. 46), to depose a non-party witness on written questions (ECF No. 47), for the issuance of a subpoena for the appearance at deposition and production of documents by a non-party witness (ECF No. 48), and for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 50). I. Background The case proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1), which the court found to state a potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Tappan. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff served discovery requests, including requests for production of documents (RFPs), on defendant on June 27, 2022. On August 15, 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.