Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20231:21-cv-00327California2,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-ADA-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL

R. MORENO, et al., (ECF No. 120)

13 Defendants. 14 15 Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s unreasonable search and seizure claims against defendants Valencia, Moreno, Chavez, Dohs, and Ceballos, based on Plaintiff’s allegations that after Plaintiff was subjected to a full body scan, he was immediately subjected to an additional strip search without justification. (ECF Nos. 22, 42, & 43). On November 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 120). On December 13, 2022, Defendants filed their opposition. (ECF No. 128). This motion to compel is now before the Court. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff’s 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.