Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-1800 JLT SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

E. MUNOZ, et al., (Doc. 12) Defendants.

16 Earnest S. Harris asserts that the defendants deprived him of his civil rights while incarcerated at California State Prison- Corcoran. (See Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge reviewed the allegations of Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for: (1) excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Munoz and Arreguin, (2) deliberate indifference against Romero, (3) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Munoz and Arreguin, and (4) violation of due process against Munoz. However, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s remaining claims failed, including claims stated against Huerta. Therefore, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiff the option to…