Lawrence
Lawrence v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROBERT LAWRENCE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01224-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT BE
GRANTED
13 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., (ECF No. 29). 14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART,
PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR
MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF
18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Lawrence’s motion to vacate judgment. (ECF No. 29). Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. opposes.1 (ECF No. 31). The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned finds the motion suitable for submission without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the following reasons, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion be granted.2 I. BACKGROUND This case concerns a home loan Plaintiff obtained from…