(PS) Lugo v. Durham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN SUE LUGO, No. 2:22-cv-0646 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADRIANA DURHAM, THE

MORTGAGE LAW FIRM, JAMES F.

LEWIN, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Karen Sue Lugo is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed October 19, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of service of the order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight-day period has long since expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Moreover,…