Aceves

(PC) Williams v. Aceves

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20232:21-cv-00921California680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III, No. 2:21-cv-0921 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACEVES, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 22, 2022, defendant Aceves filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not file an opposition; instead, he sought an extension of time in light of his inability to access his legal materials. Briefing on the motion was delayed until plaintiff was provided access to his legal materials. Subsequently, plaintiff paroled and was issued his property. On February 27, 2023, plaintiff was directed to file an opposition within thirty days. Thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition.

In that order, despite plaintiff’s failure to inform the court of his new address, plaintiff’s address of record was changed to reference plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.