Porter

Porter v. Yuba City Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20232:20-cv-01554California1,321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Quiana Porter, 1] No. 2:20-cv-01554-KJM-DB Plaintiffs, ORDER Vv. Yuba City Police Officers Escheman, Hansen, Jensen, Jurado, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 After prevailing on a summary judgment motion, defendants filed a Bill of Costs, requesting reimbursement of $3,401.85 in fees for printed or electronically recorded deposition 19 transcripts obtained for litigation purposes. Bill of Costs, ECF No. 84. The Bill of Costs itemizes 20 no other costs and expenses. /d. Plaintiff filed late objections to the Bill of Costs. Opp’n, ECF No. 86; see E.D. Cal. L.R. 292(c) (“ The party against whom costs are claimed may, within seven 22 (7) days from date of service, file specific objections to claimed items with a statement of grounds 23 for objection.”). Defendants filed a reply a month later, responding to the objections. Reply, ECF No. 89. The court considers all the pleadings because doing so would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.