Jordan

Jordan v. Nor-Cal Pipeline Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20232:22-cv-00540California161 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAPHNIE JORDAN, No. 2:22-CV-00540-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. NOR-CAL PIPELINE SERVICES, Defendants. 15 16 17 18 On July 29, 2022, this court issued an order directing the parties to submit, within thirty 20 days, a motion seeking approval of their settlement agreement in accordance with Local Rule 230. ECF No. 7. Many months have since passed and the parties have filed no such motion. Thus, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be 23 dismissed for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 (9th Cir. 1998) (citing Henderson vy. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986)). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 30, 2023.