(PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20232:21-cv-02132California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY JOE MILLER, No. 2:21-CV-2132-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On September 12, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and contained notice that the parties may file objections within fourteen days after service. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.1 Plaintiff does not address the findings and recommendations’ legal conclusion that the complaint lacks facts regarding a policy or custom causing plaintiff’s injuries. See Objs., ECF No. 25. Instead, plaintiff reiterates the three alleged harms that occurred in the jail, while 27 Plaintiff’s objections have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.