Hunt

(PC) Braden v. Hunt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20231:23-cv-00469California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL W. BRADEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00469-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

THE COURT AND REQUEST FOR ADR

v. (ECF No. 9) K. HUNT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Paul W. Braden (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This action, originally filed in the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, was transferred to the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California on March 28, 2023. (See ECF No. 6.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for ADR, filed on March 27, 2023. (ECF No. 9.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied. /// /// /// I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff indicates his case has been stalled for over six months, and requests an order requiring CDCR to present someone with settlement authority to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.