(PC) Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20231:22-cv-00401California1,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY W. MUNDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00401-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. EMERGENCY INJUNCTION AND MOTION

FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL (ECF Nos. 35, 36) STAFF, et al.,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-

Defendants. ONE DAYS 17 18 19 Plaintiff Stanley W. Mundy (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions for an emergency injunction (ECF No. 35) and for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 36), both filed on March 29, 2023. For the following reasons, the Court shall recommend both motions be denied. /// /// 27 1 Plaintiff also filed a second amended complaint on March 29, 2023, which the Court shall address by separate screening order. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.