(PC)Facundo
(PC)Facundo v. Hill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE FACUNDO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00285-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT
ORDERS
HILL, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Joe Facundo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On March 1, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 9.) The Court determined Plaintiff’s complaint plausibly alleged an Eighth Amendment failure to protect violation against Defendant Hill. However, Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any other cognizable claim against any other named Defendant. (Id. at 4-6.) The Court directed Plaintiff to elect one of the following options: (1) file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order; or (2) file a notice indicating he does not wish to file a first amended 26 …