Rau

(PS) Bordin v. Rau

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20232:22-cv-02046California754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GENE BORDIN, No. 2:22-CV-2046-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JON RAU, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 9. Plaintiff initiated this action by way of a complaint filed on November 14, 2022. See ECF No. 1. In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges that he is a resident of the State of California and that both named defendants – Jon and Josh Rau – are residents of the State of Nevada. See id. at 2, 4. Plaintiff asserts subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. See id. at 3. In their motion to dismiss, Defendants argue that the action must be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. See ECF No. 9; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In their declarations submitted in support of the motion to dismiss, Defendants Jon and Josh…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.