Calderon

(PC) Tejada v. Calderon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20231:21-cv-01112California377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RANDY TEJADA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01112-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN

S. CALDERON, THIRTY DAYS

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Randy Tejada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 23, 2022, 18 Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 36). On December 12, 2022, Plaintiff 19 filed a motion requesting a sixty-day extension to oppose Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 37). The 20 Court granted Plaintiff’s request and ordered that Plaintiff file an opposition to Defendant’s 21 motion for summary judgment by February 21, 2023. (ECF No. 38). To date, Plaintiff has not 22 filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. 23 Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver 24 of any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.