Ivey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’ANNUNZIO PATRON, Case No. 2:21-cv-01063-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

SCOTT IVEY, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On February 21, 2023, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s deposition and modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 36. Plaintiff has not filed a response. In cases in which a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. To manage its docket effectively, the court…