Krpin
(PC) Cox v. Krpin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., No. 2:18-cv-02523 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JOHN KRPIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 45) and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 49.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. The court will also deny defendant’s request for extension of time (ECF No. 52) as moot and deny plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 54). //// //// //// //// BACKGROUND I. Procedural History The present…