Deems
(PC) Mills v. Deems
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JAMES MILLS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01738-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
MICHAEL R. DEEMS, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 On December 2, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it failed to state a claim, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 11. I also warned him that failure to comply with the December 2 order could result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 4. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on January 23, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 12. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action he must file, within twenty-one days, an amended complaint. I also warned him that…