(PC) Calhoun v. Dela Cruz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20232:20-cv-02209California3,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMONT L. CALHOUN, No. 2:20-cv-02209 DAD DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND R. DELA CRUZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, Jamont L. Calhoun, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is before the court. (ECF No. 48.) Defendants have also moved to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply pertaining to that motion. (ECF No. 69.) In addition to opposing the motion for summary judgment, plaintiff has filed a motion to amend the complaint, a motion for extension of time to respond to the motion to strike, a motion styled as a motion to amend Local Rule 230(l), and a motion for a court order for plaintiff to file documents electronically. (ECF No. 60, 71, 72, 73.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the motion for summary judgment be granted and the motion to amend be denied. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.