(PC) Bennett v. Monroe Detention Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20232:22-cv-02157California5,784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:22-cv-2157 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MONROE DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that his right to access the court has been denied, he has been retaliated against, and he has not received adequate mental health treatment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5), motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 6, 9, 10), motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 8), motion to expedite (ECF No. 12), and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will deny the request to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice, deny the motion to expedite, deny the motions for injunctive relief without prejudice, and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.