(PC)Trehearne

(PC)Trehearne v. Amador County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20232:22-cv-00254California400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS TREHEARNEL, No. 2:22-cv-00254 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AMADOR COUNTY, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former1 county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 2022, defendant Amador County filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(1) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” On August 1, 2022, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for 24 1 Review of the Amador County inmate locator website indicates that plaintiff is no longer in 25 custody. The court may take judicial notice of information stored on Amador County’s inmate locator website. See In re Yahoo Mail Litig., 7 F.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.