Doe

Doe v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20231:22-cv-01569California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01569-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE OFFICER

v. FAVRE AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS

ACTION

GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., (ECF Nos. 38, 39, 40) Defendants.

16 On December 5, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) initiated this civil rights action against Defendant Officers Greg Rodriguez, Favre, Allen, Valladares, and Mosqueda, Acting Warden Michael Pallares, the State of California, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (collectively, “Defendants”) on December 5, 2022, for claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) On March 8, 2023, the State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation were terminated as Defendants in this action pursuant to the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 30.) As to Defendant Officer Favre, no responsive pleading has been filed, nor a request for entry of default. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.