Gastelum

Gastelum v. Shop Q, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20231:22-cv-01176California230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-01176-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

v. (ECF No. 10) SHOP Q, INC., Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 10), with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), as Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. In light of the voluntary dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and has been dismissed with prejudice. See 20 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 21 Further, given the fact that Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal is in response to the 22 Court’s March 15, 2023, order to show cause, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 23 1. The Court’s order to show cause (ECF No. 9) is DISCHARGED; and 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. 2 IT IS SO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.