Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIE ENCAR ARNOLD, Case No. 1:23-cv-00266-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR ELECTRONIC FILING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, et (Doc. 7) al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Marie Encar Arnold (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action filed on February 22, 2023. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has paid the filing fee and this matter is set for a scheduling conference on May 18, 2023; however, no Defendant has yet appeared. (Doc. 3). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for electronic filing. (Doc. 7). Under the Court’s Local Rules, pro se parties are required to “file and serve paper documents” and “may not utilize electronic filing except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” Local Rule 133(b)(2) (emphasis omitted). Any request for an exception to this rule must be submitted as a stipulation between the parties or a “written motion setting out an explanation of reasons for…