Warden

(PC) Carroll v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20231:21-cv-01605California1,048 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ABONILICO CARROLL, Case No. 1:21-cv-01605-ADA-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

A. MEDINA, COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS AND TO

PROSECUTE THIS CASE Defendant. (ECF Nos. 36, 40, & 44)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 Abonilico Carroll (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 2022, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to submit scheduling and discovery statements within thirty days. (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff did not file a scheduling and discovery statement, and his deadline to do so passed. Accordingly, on January 30, 2023, the Court gave Plaintiff an additional twenty-one days to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.