Miranda

(PC) Armenta v. Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:23-cv-00022California1,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:23-cv-00022-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS RAFAEL MIRANDA, et al., ECF No. 6 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH HIS CLAIMS

AGAINST DEFENDANT MIRANDA; OR

15 (2) DELAY SERVING ANY DEFENDANT AND FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 1 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care. His allegations against defendant Miranda are cognizable, but his claims against the other defendants are too conclusory to proceed. Plaintiff must choose whether to proceed only with his claims against Miranda or to delay serving any defendant and file an amended complaint. I will also grant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.