Kurgan

(PC) Garcia v. Kurgan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:22-cv-01068California544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LUCIEN GARCIA, Case No. 2:22-cv-01068-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 On November 14, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it alleged cognizable excessive force and retaliation claims against defendant Kurgan. I notified plaintiff that his other claims were not viable. ECF No. 19. I gave plaintiff thirty days either to file an amended complaint or to advise the court that he wished to stand by his current complaint and to proceed only with his excessive force and retaliation claims against defendant Kurgan. Id. at 6. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the November 14 order could result in dismissal. Id. Plaintiff did not file either an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.