(PS) Halousek v. Sacramento County Sheriff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA HALOUSEK, No. 2:21-cv-2351 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE AND THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Sheila Halousek is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 26, 2022, and October 31, 2022, orders sent to plaintiff were returned as undeliverable. Pursuant to Local Rule 183(b) a plaintiff appearing pro se has a duty to keep the Court advised of his or her current address. If mail directed at the plaintiff is returned by the U.S. Postal Service and the plaintiff fails to provide a current address within 63 days, “the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” (Id.) Here, well over 63 days have passed and plaintiff has not provided a current address. //// //// //// …